Philosophy Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1

Philosophy - Assignment typeThis rail line is structured around an analogy. Identify what is being compared in this analogy and explain why Cleanthes believes he is justified in this comparison (Hint Support Cleanthes position by pointing to some relevantly resembling characteristics amongst the two analogues). Philo offers a rebuttal to Cleanthes argument that is based on the analogical structure of Cleanthes argument. What is this rebuttal (Note You take up not recreate Philos entire argument a description of how to evaluate an analogical argument and the problem Philo sees with Cleanthes argument will suffice)? Finally, I built upon Philos rebuttal to Cleanthes using the theory of evolution. why does evolution present a problem for the Argument from Design? An Empiricist philosopher David Hume in his Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion justifies the bearing of God via rational truths like death, birth, illness, healing mechanism and spiritual being of living beings. He ste adfastly believes that humans accept the rationality of an idea/theory entirely when they experience it. Hence, the belief mechanism is forever and a day supported by realism. Hume gathers enough evidence for his readers to identify the presence of God via his attributes in the universal facts. ... Simultaneously, the mind capacity (divine intellect) of the developer God cannot be measured, as he has endowed humans with hold in intellect, who can clutch their beliefs on the bases of their experiences. Moreover, he also differentiates between impression and ideas which develop the theory of belief. However, several phenomena like support after(prenominal) death are a belief which requires experience and in such a scenario humans can only rely on provided notions of different religions. Hence, one accepts orthodox notion of life after death according to his understanding or acceptance of such facts according to his invisible faith. Humans cannot evaluate, reason or weigh relig ious notions on the bases of their intellectual comprehension as God has provided humans with limited intellect (an attribute God encircles himself) finished which they can only understand fewer signs of his being. Yet, this is the attribute (intellect) which is similar to him that brings humans to a level higher than the other living beings he developed. The skeptic Jewish philosopher Philo Judaeus, denies the frame/ machine analogy Cleanthes presents. He bases his argument against it and on the fact that universe or any entity on it does not depict the true nature of God (Hume & Stanley, 5). They are his creations/ innovations, but his attributes cannot be assumed through them. They are mere signs of his presence, his attribute like infinity, immensity, eternality, astuteness and aptness are few qualities which are only his. Therefore, Philo argues that to assume Gods nature from his creations is an unrealistic idea. Moreover, he argues that if universe is a